7 orders · Page 1 of 1
The High Court noted that the disputes were resolved under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, rendering the appeals infructuous. Consequently, the appeals were closed.
The High Court noted that the disputes were resolved under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, rendering the appeals infructuous. Consequently, the appeals were closed.
The High Court noted that the disputes were resolved under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, rendering the appeals infructuous. Consequently, the appeals were closed.
The High Court noted that the disputes were resolved under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, rendering the appeals infructuous. Consequently, the appeals were closed.
The High Court noted that the disputes were resolved under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, rendering the appeals infructuous. Consequently, the appeals were closed.
The tribunal held that interest on delayed refunds, as per Supreme Court judgments, becomes part of the principal amount and is thus eligible for further interest if delayed. The appeal by the revenue was dismissed as lacking merit.
The High Court held that Section 34 of the Arbitration Act does not mandate the filing of a signed copy of the award, and the rules of the court do not specify this requirement. Therefore, the initial filing with a photocopy attested by an Assistant Engineer was considered valid.